PREDICTION BECOMES REALITY - ENGEL MAKES WHITE NATIONALISM POLITICALLY RELEVANT FOR 2020 - The left is establishing a major component to their 2020 campaign - 'white nationalism'

In a press release today, Democratic Chairmen of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, Eliot Engel, officially called for federal intervention to counter 'white nationalism' in the US. Why?

Here's the backstory before we answer that question.

Twelve days ago and immediately on the heels of the New Zealand mosque shootings, which leaves room for legitimate false flag discussions; especially given the nexus between the federal intelligence apparatus and political elites relative to the country, we drew attention to the peculiarity of it all and outlined 9 reasons for it. That discussion can be found here:

Recall that Democratic House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler attempted to give the 'white nationalism' merit, veracity and legitimacy as he placed it on the legislative record by calling a hearing on the matter. Here's the story from The Hill:

Two days following the original post further discussion was had and predicated on the immediate injection of 'white nationalism' into the mainstream public discourse following the shootings - that's a clear sign of an ulterior agenda in play. The argument in the discussion pertained to the odds of seeing white nationalism as a 2020 campaign topic, which we guaranteed. That discussion can be found here:

The following day, House DHS Committee Chairmen Bennie Thompson requested the censorship of terror-related content on big-tech platforms and social media, in what appears to be a furtherance of Conservative discourse being censored in the public domain. That discussion can be found here:

Yesterday, Thompson issued a press release germane to Facebook and following-up on the original directive he issued. From the press release,
“Finally, Facebook has acted to remove this vile and hate-filled content from its platform.  While welcomed news, this should have happened long ago.  We insist that Facebook ensures the public that it follows through on this promise, and that this announcement is not solely window dressing.  For too long, Facebook has allowed hate speech – and the violence that it can inspire – to propagate on its platform. Since billions use its service, we must demand more from them. Facebook can and must do better.”
Relevant questions, Mr. Thompson: a) Precisely who is it that gets to determine which speech is hateful and which speech is not? and b) How can the expression of one's personal views, no matter whether they be hateful or otherwise, be legally censored under the First Amendment presuming they cause no demonstrable harm to others (claiming 'Fire!' in a crowded movie theater)?


This brings us back to the present and provides an opportunity to answer, 'Why?' Today in the press release linked below, Engel made an official call for the federal apparatus to take action on white nationalism. From the press release,

"Representative Eliot L. Engel, Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, today urged the State Department to make addressing the global threat of white nationalist terrorism a foreign policy priority. In a letter to Secretary Pompeo, Chairman Engel called on the Department to designate the perpetrator of the recent attacks in New Zealand as a terrorist and called for a briefing to Congress on efforts to grapple with white nationalist terrorism.
“Just as with Islamist terrorism, we must target white nationalist terrorism, and the networks and ideologies which underpin it globally to safeguard the United States, our allies, and our interests.”
 In light of this new effort by Engel, our previous analysis rings truer than ever. Consider:

1. As discussed in other posts, this is a maneuver to establish the topic in the legislative record thus providing it merit, status and validation. Subsequently, it will allow the Democrats to anchor a lie about the president back to an important House matter for which they are already conducting business. This is an effort to give legislative veracity to the lie of the president being part and parcel to and/or supporting 'white nationalism.' Or, in other words it allows the Democrats to sell the lie to a low-information public as the truth because it's stamped with the official seal of the House of Representatives. (Source:

2. Recall, the FBI considers 'white nationalism' a form of domestic terrorism. Today, House DHS Committee Chairmen Bennie Thompson requested the censorship of terror-related content on big-tech platforms/SM. Beneath its cheap veneer of good intentions, see this for exactly what it is - a thinly veiled attempt to continue censoring Conservatives with an overreaching application of censorship directives. (Source:

Item one above provides the pretext for the establishment of item two, which is the furtherance of public Conservative discourse being broadly censored across the most prominent public platforms. Given the evidence currently on hand, it would be a fundamental mistake to dismiss the close proximity of the actions and words of these Democratic lawmakers relative to the New Zealand shootings relative to the nexus between the political elites and New Zealand relative to the Five Eyes intelligence accord relative to the CIA's rogue involvement (see former CIA Director John Brennan) in targeting the Trump administration and it's Conservative and traditionalist views.

All of that answers the question 'Why?' and you can take it straight from Engle's letter,
"I write regarding the clear and growing transnational threat posed by white nationalist terrorism, as exemplified most recently by the horrific terrorist attacks in Christchurch, New Zealand and last fall by the shocking and ghastly attack on a synagogue in Pittsburgh."

This is only the beginning. If the left has it its way, Trump's 2020 campaign will be depicted in the MSM like a Klan rally. On a level, it already is.



Popular posts from this blog